NotesDoubtfully ascribed by Campbell to the Netherlands, but excluded by HPT on the basis of types. GW MS described the Kempten copy with the beginning f.la: "Informatio putilis de fraternitate / / et Rosario gloriose virginis Marie. / / Notum sit cristifidelibi vniuersis: q sancta...", end f.2b, l.8: "Inclita pura pia castissima virgo Maria / / Esto salutata semper prole beata / / Me tibi virgo pia comendo semper Maria" and assigned it to Kunne (type 6). But it is not clear, whether the Kempten copy and that one cited by Goff belong to the same edition
Language of itemlat
Reference worksGoff I77; HC 9184; C 3266a; Camp 1014; Saam *10; Morg 390; GW M12071
NotesDoubtfully ascribed by Campbell to the Netherlands, but excluded by HPT on the basis of types. GW MS described the Kempten copy with the beginning f.la: "Informatio putilis de fraternitate / / et Rosario gloriose virginis Marie. / / Notum sit cristifidelibi vniuersis: q sancta...", end f.2b, l.8: "Inclita pura pia castissima virgo Maria / / Esto salutata semper prole beata / / Me tibi virgo pia comendo semper Maria" and assigned it to Kunne (type 6). But it is not clear, whether the Kempten copy and that one cited by Goff belong to the same edition
Language of itemlat
Reference worksGoff I77; HC 9184; C 3266a; Camp 1014; Saam *10; Morg 390; GW M12071
